Know Your Rights: 1st, 2nd, 5th, 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th Amendments
  • Ages13–18 yearsThis age range is required to enroll.
  • FormatWeekly Class • Online
  • Length50 minutes
  • ScheduleMeets once per week
Weekly Class • Online

Know Your Rights: 1st, 2nd, 5th, 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th Amendments

The Bill of Rights was written for everyone — including you. This class breaks down seven amendments using real cases, real scenarios, and real arguments so teenagers can think, speak, and stand on solid legal ground.

Price
$25.00/week
See Classes
Parent testimonials
My son absolutely loves this class and we love it for our son. The teacher is wonderful and the content is exactly what we were looking for. Love that Mr. Traywick doesn't just let them say their opinion without giving a reason, and the light-hearted banter that comes along with the discussion. Already signed our son up for another one of Mr. Traywick's classes.
— Brittany H.

Know Your Rights: 1st, 2nd, 5th, 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th Amendments

First Amendment — Free Speech, Religion, Press, Assembly & Petition

  • What the First Amendment actually says — and why reading the exact text matters before analyzing any case
  • Why the First Amendment only restricts government action and not private schools, employers, or social media platforms
  • What “abridging” free speech means and why the threshold for government interference is intentionally high
  • How the Supreme Court’s “categorical approach” identifies types of speech that receive no First Amendment protection at all
  • Why true threats, incitement to imminent lawless action, and fighting words fall outside First Amendment protection
  • What the “substantial disruption” test is and how it determines when schools can legally punish student speech
  • How Tinker v. Des Moines established that students do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate
  • What Bethel School District v. Fraser and Morse v. Frederick added to the limits on student speech rights
  • How off-campus speech — including social media posts made from home — is treated differently from on-campus speech
  • What the Supreme Court decided in Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. about a student’s off-campus Snapchat post
  • Why symbolic speech — armbands, flags, burning the flag — receives the same First Amendment protection as spoken words
  • What prior restraint is, why courts treat it as the most serious First Amendment violation, and when it is ever permitted
  • Why some categories of speech — obscenity, defamation, true threats — receive reduced or no constitutional protection
  • What freedom of the press means for professional journalists and what it means for student journalists specifically
  • How Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier gave schools significant control over school-sponsored student newspapers
  • What the Establishment Clause prohibits — government actions that establish, endorse, or promote religion
  • What the Free Exercise Clause protects — the right to hold religious beliefs and in most cases to act on them
  • Why the line between the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause is one of the most litigated areas in all of constitutional law
  • What Engel v. Vitale decided about school-sponsored prayer and why that ruling still generates controversy
  • Why student-led, student-initiated prayer is constitutionally protected while teacher-led or school-sponsored prayer is not
  • How Kennedy v. Bremerton School District changed the legal landscape for public school employees and religious expression
  • What the right to peaceful assembly protects — gathering, marching, and demonstrating in public spaces
  • What a “time, place, and manner” restriction is and why such restrictions can be constitutional even when they limit speech
  • Why a permit requirement for a public protest can be constitutional in some circumstances and unconstitutional in others
  • What the right to petition the government means — from formal legal petitions to contacting elected officials
  • How the petition clause connects to the broader right to participate in democratic governance
  • Why counter-protests are constitutionally protected and what the government can and cannot do to separate opposing groups

Second Amendment — The Right to Bear Arms

  • What the Second Amendment actually says — and why every word in a 27-word sentence matters
  • What “well regulated militia” meant in 1791 and how that original meaning shapes modern legal debates
  • The difference between the collective rights interpretation and the individual rights interpretation
  • What District of Columbia v. Heller decided and what it deliberately left unanswered
  • What McDonald v. City of Chicago added by applying the Second Amendment to state and local governments
  • What New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen changed about how courts evaluate gun regulations
  • What the “historical tradition” test requires and why it replaced the previous two-part interest balancing test
  • Which categories of people are prohibited from owning firearms under federal law and why
  • Why the minimum age to purchase a handgun from a licensed dealer is 21 but the minimum age to receive one as a gift differs
  • What the law says specifically about minors possessing firearms — and how state laws vary dramatically
  • Where firearms are prohibited by federal law regardless of state law — schools, federal buildings, and beyond
  • What the Gun-Free School Zones Act prohibits and what the Supreme Court initially said about it in United States v. Lopez
  • What open carry means, which states allow it, and what constitutional protection it receives
  • What concealed carry means and how Bruen changed the legal standard states must meet to restrict it
  • What red flag laws are, how they work procedurally, and the constitutional due process objections raised against them
  • How the Second Amendment interacts with domestic violence convictions and restraining orders
  • What “sensitive places” doctrine allows governments to prohibit firearms even after Bruen expanded gun rights
  • Why the Second Amendment applies to the federal government and the states but not to private property owners
  • What bump stocks, suppressors, and short-barreled rifles are and how federal law treats them differently from standard firearms
  • How state assault weapons bans have survived — or failed — constitutional challenge after Bruen
  • What the difference is between a felony and a misdemeanor conviction in terms of Second Amendment rights
  • Whether convicted felons can ever have their Second Amendment rights restored and under what process
  • Why the Second Amendment debate involves three separate conversations — constitutional law, federal statute, and state law — that are easy to confuse

Fifth Amendment — Due Process & Takings Clause

  • What the Fifth Amendment actually says and which of its protections are most relevant to everyday life
  • What procedural due process requires — notice, a hearing, and a neutral decision-maker — before the government takes something from you
  • What substantive due process protects — rights so fundamental that the government cannot take them regardless of what procedures it follows
  • Why due process appears in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and what the difference is
  • What it means for a public school to violate a student’s due process rights in a suspension or expulsion proceeding
  • What Goss v. Lopez decided about the minimum due process a student is entitled to before being suspended
  • What the Takings Clause says and the two conditions it places on government seizure of private property
  • What eminent domain is, where the power comes from, and how it is exercised in practice
  • What “public use” means — roads, schools, and military bases — versus what it has been stretched to include
  • What Kelo v. City of New London decided, why it provoked a national backlash, and what legislative responses followed
  • What “just compensation” means and how disputes over the value of taken property are resolved
  • What a regulatory taking is — when a government regulation restricts property use so severely it functions as a physical taking
  • What Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City established as the balancing test for regulatory takings
  • What Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council decided about regulations that eliminate all economic value from property
  • What civil asset forfeiture is — law enforcement seizing property connected to alleged criminal activity without a conviction
  • How civil asset forfeiture differs from criminal asset forfeiture and why the distinction matters for due process
  • What reforms states have passed to limit civil asset forfeiture and what the federal program still allows

Seventh Amendment — Civil Jury Trials

  • What the Seventh Amendment says and why it applies only to federal courts and not automatically to state courts
  • What the difference is between a civil case and a criminal case — parties, burden of proof, and consequences
  • Why the founders considered the civil jury trial a fundamental safeguard against both government overreach and judicial corruption
  • What “suits at common law” means and how courts determine which civil claims trigger the Seventh Amendment right
  • Why the $20 threshold written into the Seventh Amendment reflects 1791 monetary values and what it means in modern terms
  • What a bench trial is and what it means when both parties waive their right to a jury
  • How civil juries are selected, how many jurors are required, and what unanimity rules apply
  • What the difference is between a general verdict and a special verdict in a civil case
  • What compensatory damages are and how a jury calculates what a plaintiff has actually lost
  • What punitive damages are, when they are awarded, and whether the Constitution limits how large they can be
  • What nominal damages are and why a plaintiff might win a civil case but receive only one dollar
  • What the standard of proof in a civil case is — preponderance of the evidence — and how it differs from the criminal standard
  • Whether a minor can sue or be sued in civil court and what procedural differences apply
  • What a guardian ad litem is and why minors typically need one to participate in civil litigation
  • What mandatory arbitration is and how it differs from a voluntary agreement to arbitrate after a dispute arises
  • How arbitration clauses in consumer contracts, employment agreements, and app terms of service eliminate jury trial rights before any dispute exists
  • What the Federal Arbitration Act does and why the Supreme Court has interpreted it to broadly enforce arbitration agreements
  • What class action waivers in arbitration clauses do and why they matter for disputes involving small individual losses
  • Whether arbitration clauses in contracts signed by or on behalf of minors are enforceable
  • What the Seventh Amendment does not cover — equity cases, administrative proceedings, and family court matters

Eighth Amendment — Cruel & Unusual Punishment

  • What the Eighth Amendment says and where the phrase “cruel and unusual punishment” originally came from
  • What the three separate protections of the Eighth Amendment are — excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishment
  • What the “evolving standards of decency” test is and why the Supreme Court ties constitutional meaning to shifting social consensus
  • How the Court measures evolving standards — legislative trends, jury behavior, and its own independent judgment
  • What Furman v. Georgia decided about the death penalty in 1972 and why it did not abolish capital punishment outright
  • What Gregg v. Georgia established four years later and how it revived the constitutionality of capital punishment
  • What Atkins v. Virginia decided about executing people with intellectual disabilities
  • What Roper v. Simmons decided in 2005 about executing individuals for crimes committed before age 18
  • Why the Court in Roper found that international consensus and scientific evidence about adolescent brain development were constitutionally relevant
  • What Graham v. Florida decided about life without parole for juvenile offenders convicted of non-homicide offenses
  • What Miller v. Alabama decided about mandatory life without parole sentences for juvenile homicide offenders
  • What Montgomery v. Louisiana added by making Miller retroactive — meaning people already serving those sentences could seek resentencing
  • What brain science says about adolescent decision-making and impulse control and why the Supreme Court found it legally significant
  • What the proportionality principle requires — that punishment must be proportional to the severity of the offense
  • What Solem v. Helm established as the three-factor test for evaluating whether a non-capital sentence is disproportionate
  • What Harmelin v. Michigan and Ewing v. California said about lengthy sentences for non-violent offenses
  • Whether solitary confinement constitutes cruel and unusual punishment and what courts have said specifically about its use on juveniles
  • What the Eighth Amendment requires with respect to prison conditions — medical care, protection from violence, and basic human needs
  • What excessive bail means and what factors courts consider when setting bail amounts
  • What cash bail reform looks like as a constitutional matter and what arguments are made on both sides
  • What excessive fines means after Timbs v. Indiana applied the Eighth Amendment’s fines clause to the states
  • Why Timbs matters for civil asset forfeiture and whether fines and forfeitures can themselves be unconstitutional
  • What “categorical” Eighth Amendment rules are — blanket prohibitions on certain punishments for certain classes of offenders — versus “as applied” challenges to individual sentences
  • Why school corporal punishment is not covered by the Eighth Amendment and what Ingraham v. Wright decided

Ninth Amendment — Unenumerated Rights

  • What the Ninth Amendment says in full and what problem it was written to solve
  • Why James Madison included the Ninth Amendment and what objection to the Bill of Rights it was designed to answer
  • What an “unenumerated right” is and why the distinction between listed and unlisted rights matters
  • Why the Ninth Amendment is sometimes called the “forgotten amendment” and why courts have been reluctant to use it directly
  • What Griswold v. Connecticut decided about the right to privacy and how the Court found it in the constitutional text
  • What “penumbras” and “emanations” means in Justice Douglas’s Griswold opinion and why that reasoning has been criticized
  • How different justices have used different amendments — including the Ninth — to locate the right to privacy
  • What Eisenstadt v. Baird extended from Griswold and why the extension mattered
  • What bodily autonomy means as a constitutional concept and where courts have located it in the text
  • What the right to travel is, where it comes from constitutionally, and what restrictions on movement courts have struck down
  • What parental rights are as a constitutional matter and what Pierce v. Society of Sisters and Meyer v. Nebraska established
  • What the right to direct the education of your children means in the context of homeschooling and private schooling
  • What originalism says about the Ninth Amendment — whether it supports or undermines an expansive reading of unenumerated rights
  • What living constitutionalism says about the Ninth Amendment and how it justifies protecting rights the founders never specifically named
  • Why the debate over unenumerated rights is ultimately a debate about who gets to identify them — courts, legislatures, or the people
  • What the difference is between the Ninth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause as sources of unenumerated rights
  • Why the Ninth Amendment becomes especially important when new technologies create new privacy and autonomy questions the founders never anticipated
  • What the relationship is between the Ninth Amendment and rights that were assumed so obvious they were never written down

Tenth Amendment — Reserved Powers & Federalism

  • What the Tenth Amendment says and what the phrase “reserved to the states respectively or to the people” means
  • What federalism is and why the United States operates as a union of sovereign states rather than a single unified legal system
  • What “enumerated powers” are and why the limited list of federal powers in Article I is the foundation of the Tenth Amendment
  • What the Necessary and Proper Clause does and why its broad interpretation has always been in tension with the Tenth Amendment
  • What the Commerce Clause says and how the Supreme Court expanded its reach far beyond interstate trade during the New Deal era
  • What United States v. Lopez decided in 1995 and why it was the first time in sixty years the Court struck down a federal law as exceeding Commerce Clause authority
  • What United States v. Morrison added to the Lopez framework and what it says about the limits of federal power
  • What nullification is — the idea that states can declare federal law void within their borders — and why federal courts have consistently rejected it
  • What interposition is and how it differs from nullification
  • What the Supremacy Clause says and why it means federal law wins when it directly conflicts with state law
  • What preemption is and how courts determine whether federal law has displaced state law in a particular area
  • What the anti-commandeering doctrine is and why the federal government cannot order state officials to enforce federal law
  • What New York v. United States decided about the federal government directing state legislatures
  • What Printz v. United States decided about the federal government ordering state executive officers to implement federal programs
  • What Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association added to the anti-commandeering doctrine
  • What the Spending Clause allows the federal government to do — attach conditions to federal funding — and what limits NFIB v. Sebelius placed on that power
  • Why marijuana can be legal under state law and simultaneously illegal under federal law without the state law being struck down
  • What the “laboratories of democracy” metaphor means and which justice coined it
  • Why education is primarily a state function and what the constitutional basis is for federal involvement in public schools
  • What sanctuary city policies are and how the Tenth Amendment’s anti-commandeering doctrine protects them
  • Why the Tenth Amendment’s practical force has been debated since the founding and what periods of history tested it most severely
  • What the difference is between the Ninth Amendment and the Tenth Amendment — one reserves rights to the people, the other reserves powers to the states
  • Why a teenager moving from one state to another may find that their legal rights on the same issues are dramatically different

Available Class Times

There are no bookable times for this class listing yet.